Poster

  • MS1.P029

STEM-EELS investigation of Cu/CeO2-TiO2 used in CO oxidation

Presented in

Poster session MS 1: Energy-related materials and catalysts

Poster topics

Authors

Nils Rockstroh (Rostock / DE), Carsten Robert Kreyenschulte (Rostock / DE), Jawaher Mosrati (Rostock / DE), Thanh Huyen Vuong (Rostock / DE), Jabor Rabeah (Rostock / DE), Angelika Brückner (Rostock / DE)

Abstract

Abstract text (incl. figure legends and references)

The heterogeneous catalytic oxidation of CO is an important reaction which impacts many technical applications such as fuel cells (preferential oxidation of CO instead of H2), air purification, exhaust-gas emission treatment, CO sensors and CO2 lasers.[1] Therefore, research focuses on the development and investigation of active and selective catalysts, preferentially containing abundant metals. Copper is a promising and well-investigated candidate, which, upon immobilization on CeO2, forms redox-active Cu2+/Cu+ couples. CeO2 itself has a high oxygen mobility and the ability to form Ce4+/Ce3+ couples, two properties which can be even improved by incorporation of titanium.

Three Cu doped CeO2-TiO2 catalysts and the pure support were prepared by a sol-gel method adding 0 (support), 0.06 (Cat1), 0.26 (Cat2), or 0.66 wt% Cu (Cat3) with Cat2 showing the best catalytic performance. To elucidate structure-activity relationships, the materials have been characterized by XRD, Raman and IR spectroscopy, STEM-EELS, NAP-XPS, and operando EPR. STEM-EELS was thereby applied to spatially resolve potential differences in the oxidation state of the containing elements.

A probe corrected JEOL JEM-ARM200F (Schottky emitter) with a Gatan Enfinium ER EELS were used for electron microscopic investigation of the catalysts. A rather high beam current was applied to keep the acquisition time low. The FWHM of the zero-loss peak (ZLP) was about 1.2 eV and the lack of de-scan was compensated by the DualEELS mode. The spectra were recalibrated at each pixel by the position of ZLP.

Cat2 (0.26 wt% Cu) shows the best catalytic performance. The relative intensity of the Raman band at 463 cm-1 and the appearance of separate CeO2 entities observed by STEM increase with the Cu content. However, Cu is not visible in the STEM HAADF and BF images due to its small Z contrast and high dispersion. This high dispersion could be proven by EPR and DRIFTS. STEM-EELS enabled the determination of the oxidation state of Ce and its distribution with respect to TiO2 (Fig. 1 and 2). It revealed that Ce is present either as Ce3+ in well-dispersed form or as Ce4+ in separate CeO2 crystallites. It could be shown that Ce3+ and Ti4+ form a Ce-Ti oxide solid solution.

Figure 1. STEM ADF image of Cat2 (left) with the corresponding Ce M edge electron energy loss (EEL) spectra of the highlighted areas (right). The shape and intensity of the edge signal points to Ce3+ in Area 1 and Ce4+ in Area 2.[2] Reprinted with permission from ref [1]. Copyright © 2021, American Chemical Society.

Figure 2. STEM ADF image of Cat2 (left) with an overlaid false color elemental map. On the right, the distribution of two different cerium species (Ce-M (a) and Ce-M (b)) and titanium is shown independently as well as in a single-color elemental map. Reprinted with permission from ref [1]. Copyright © 2021, American Chemical Society.

Using STEM-EELS with this catalyst system, it was possible to benefit from this additional spectroscopic method by providing information on the Ce oxidation state distribution which is not possible with EDXS. Although EPR and XPS provide already evidence for Ce3+, its exact localization is only possible with STEM-EELS.

[1] J. Mosrati, A.M. Abdel-Mageed, T.H. Vuong, R. Grauke, S. Bartling, N. Rockstroh, H. Atia, U. Armbruster, S. Wohlrab, J. Rabeah, A. Brückner, ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 10933-10949.

[2] Y. Zhang, S. Bals, G. Van Tendeloo, Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2019, 36, 1800287.

  • © Conventus Congressmanagement & Marketing GmbH