Back
  • ePoster
  • P115

Rimegepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: Subgroup Analyses From 3 Phase 3 Clinical Trials by Triptan Treatment Experience

Appointment

Date:
Time:
Talk time:
Discussion time:
Location / Stream:
ePoster Terminal 1

Poster

Rimegepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: Subgroup Analyses From 3 Phase 3 Clinical Trials by Triptan Treatment Experience

Topics

  • CGRP inhibitors in the clinic
  • Migraine

Authors

Christopher M. Jensen (Nerw Haven, CT/ US), Richard B. Lipton (Bronx, NY/ US), Andrew Blumenfeld (Carlsbad, CA/ US), Robert Croop (Nerw Haven, CT/ US), Alexandra C. Thiry (Nerw Haven, CT/ US), Gilbert L’Italien (Nerw Haven, CT/ US), Beth Morris (Nerw Haven, CT/ US), Vladimir Coric (Nerw Haven, CT/ US), Peter J. Goadsby (Los Angeles, CA/ US; London/ GB)

Abstract

Abstract text (incl. figure legends and references)

Objective

Assess the efficacy of rimegepant — an oral small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist — for the acute treatment of migraine in subjects with and without a history of insufficient response to triptans.

Methods

Three double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of similar design randomized adults with migraine to rimegepant 75 mg tablet (NCT03235479, NCT03237845) or ODT (NCT03461757) or placebo to treat 1 migraine attack of moderate to severe pain intensity. Subgroups with a history of insufficient response with 1 or ≥2 triptans and those without a history of insufficient response, including triptan-naïve and current triptan users, were analyzed. Triptan insufficient response was defined as self-reporting a history of discontinuing ≥1 triptan due to inadequate efficacy and/or poor tolerability. The co-primary endpoints were 2-hour freedom from pain and the most bothersome symptom (MBS).

Results

In the pooled population (N=3507: rimegepant n=1749, placebo n=1758), 2272 (64.8%) subjects had no history of triptan insufficient response and 1235 (35.2%) had a history of insufficient response with ≥1 triptan. Results for the co-primary endpoints in each triptan subgroup are shown in Figure 1. No differences in co-primary endpoints were found in pairwise comparisons of triptan subgroups in rimegepant-treated subjects (Figure 2).

Conclusions

Rimegepant was effective for the acute treatment of migraine in subjects with and without a history of triptan insufficient response. The efficacy of rimegepant was consistent among those with insufficient response to 1 or ≥2 triptans and those who were triptan-naïve or currently using triptans.

    • v1.20.0
    • © Conventus Congressmanagement & Marketing GmbH
    • Imprint
    • Privacy