Back
  • Quick shot presentation
  • QSP11.07

Functional outcome after single vs. double sacroiliac screw fixation for lateral compression-type pelvic ring injuries

Appointment

Date:
Time:
Talk time:
Discussion time:
Location / Stream:
Kosovel hall

Session

Oral Quick Shot Presentation 11

Topic

  • Polytrauma

Authors

Alba Shehu (Zurich / CH), Felix Karl Ludwig Klingebiel (Zurich / CH), Michel Paul Johan Teuben (Zurich / CH), Octavia Klee (Zurich / CH), Yannik Kalbas (Zurich / CH), Anhua Loong (Zurich / CH), Henrik Teuber (Zurich / CH), Valentin Neuhaus (Zurich / CH), Ladislav Mica (Zurich / CH), Hans-Christoph Pape (Zurich / CH), Roman Pfeifer (Zurich / CH)

Abstract

Abstract text (incl. references and figure legends)

Introduction

Lateral compression (LC) fractures are the commonest pelvic ring injury. Sacroiliac (SI) screws are used for posterior pelvic ring stabilization. Dual SI-screw stabilization (S1 plus S2) is associated with superior biomechanical properties compared with single SI-screw-stabilizations (S1-only). The current study aimed to compare functional outcome of single and dual SI-screws for LC-fractures.

Material&Methods

A retrospective study of patients treated with SI-screw stabilization of traumatic LC-fractures at a level 1 trauma center was performed. Patients were grouped based on applied treatment modality (Gr. S1: S1-screw only vs. Gr. Dual: S1 and S2-screws). Clinical and functional outcome were compared.

Results

93 patients have been included. Groups had similar patient and trauma characteristics and a pooled ISS of 18 was found. Gr. S1 consisted of 19 patients, whereas Gr. Dual included 74 individuals. LC-1 fractures were diagnosed most frequently (N=46), 38 patients had LC-2 fractures and 9 patients had LC-3 injuries. Screw loosening/malpositioning/breakage and reoperation rates did not differ between groups. Equal hospitalization times were found as well: Gr. S1: 17(10) days vs. 15 (10) days in Gr. Dual (P=0.41). At discharge, the ability to sit/stand independently did not differ (respectively: Gr. S1: 83/17% vs. Gr. Dual: 71/28%, P= 0.41/0.55. Significantly more patients from the Dual-group were discharged home than from the S1-group (28% vs. 5%, P=0.002).

Conclusion

This study shows that both single S1 and dual (S1 and S2) percutaneous SI-screw fixation for LC-fractures are feasible treatment options. Hardware-related complications as well as functional outcome are very similar. Interestingly, dual screw-fixation is associated with more discharge to home. Future studies should focus on the identification of patients who benefit most from single or dual SI-screw stabilizations.

Disclosure: Do you have a significant financial interest, consultancy or other relationship with products, manufacturer(s) of products or providers of services related to this abstract? (If not, please enter "No" in the text field.)

No.

  • © Conventus Congressmanagement & Marketing GmbH