Applications of augmented reality for intraoperative targeting
Peter C. Reinacher (Freiburg i. Br.; Aachen), Roland Rölz (Freiburg i. Br.), Amin Stanicki (Freiburg i. Br.), Nils Schallner (Freiburg i. Br.), Volker Coenen (Freiburg i. Br.), Jürgen Beck (Freiburg i. Br.), Theo Demerath (Freiburg i. Br.)
Augmented reality (AR) is a technological megatrend that is increasingly being applied in many areas. The availability of this technology increasingly prompts the question of meaningful applications in clinical practice. We have investigated various use-cases.
Four AR devices (Magic Leap 1, Plantation, FA, USA) were used in combination with neurosurgical planning software (Elements, Brainlab, Munich) for various applications. Overall, 204 procedures in three intraoperative use-cases were investigated on phantoms regarding feasibility and accuracy in order to compare AR guided procedures to the respective standard methods. On a phantom with intracranial hemorrhage, a total of 60 operations for placement of hemorrhage drains (compared with freehand and sterotactic frame-based placement) were performed by 5 surgeons. Percutaneous placements of a cannula into the foramen ovale for ablation of the gasserian ganglion in trigeminal neuralgia were performed a total of 64 times by 4 subjects (compared with the landmark-based method). 80 placements of a cannula into a defined peridural target point in the lumbar spine were performed by 4 physicians. Placement accuracy was measured using computed tomography and the planning software.
In the phantom experiments, compared to freehand applications, AR was significantly more accurate in all cases studied (p<0.001 in hemorrhage drains, p<0.01 in ganglion gasseri and p<0.0001 spinal).
Nonetheless, when compared to a stereotactic approach based on frames in the phantom experiment regarding bleeding drains, the Euclidean distance achieved using AR (median 3 mm) was lower, but it was comparable to that achieved using STX (median 1.95 mm; P=0.023). In an emergency situation, this could be offset by the better time efficiency of bedside procedures using AR compared to a stereotactic operation.
AR is an interesting technical development that allows intraoperative applications for cases that are performed landmark-based (e.g. puncture of the foramen ovale or spinal punctures) or where bed-side procedures are performed due to urgency (e.g. hemorrhage drainage).
Auf unserem Internetauftritt verwenden wir Cookies. Bei Cookies handelt es sich um kleine (Text-)Dateien, die auf Ihrem Endgerät (z.B. Smartphone, Notebook, Tablet, PC) angelegt und gespeichert werden. Einige dieser Cookies sind technisch notwendig um die Webseite zu betreiben, andere Cookies dienen dazu die Funktionalität der Webseite zu erweitern oder zu Marketingzwecken. Abgesehen von den technisch notwendigen Cookies, steht es Ihnen frei Cookies beim Besuch unserer Webseite zuzulassen oder nicht.